|
|
|
New
Reports From Responsive Management
Issues Related to
Hunting Access in the United States (2010)
New Hampshire Residents' Opinions on
and Participation in Outdoor Recreation (2010) (486KB
PDF)
Virginia Lapsed
Hunters' License Purchasing Behaviors and Their
Opinions on Messages
Encouraging Them to Purchase Hunting Licenses
(2009) (472KB
PDF)
Assessing
Experienced Hunters' Attitudes Toward Mentoring
and Their Opinions on and Interest in a Mentored Hunt Program in Arizona
(2009) (220KB
PDF)
Anchorage
Residents' Opinions on Bear and Moose Population
Levels and Management
Strategies: Focus Group
Report (2009)
Anchorage Residents' Opinions on Bear and
Moose Population Levels and Management
Strategies: Survey Report
(2009)
Attitudes of the General Public,
Stakeholders, and Employees Regarding the
Strategic Direction of the
Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife (2009)
Arkansas
Residents' and Commission Employees' Attitudes
Toward the Strategic Direction
of the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission
(2009)
| | |
|
Experienced Hunters'
Attitudes Toward Mentoring in
Arizona |
|
THE ARIZONA GAME
AND FISH DEPARTMENT (AZGFD) and
Responsive Management recently collaborated on a
qualitative research study that examined
experienced hunters' attitudes toward mentoring
and their interest in a mentored hunt program
offered through the Department. The Department
partnered with Responsive Management to conduct
the research under a grant from the National
Shooting Sports Foundation's Hunting Heritage
Partnership. The study entailed a series of five
focus groups with experienced hunters at least 50
years old. The groups were held in Mesa, Phoenix,
Pinetop, and Tucson.
AZGFD
 | Focus groups
are an established and accepted research technique
for qualitative explorations of attitudes,
opinions, perceptions, motivations, constraints,
participation, and behaviors. Focus groups are
in-depth interviews in which a small group of
participants (8 to 12) are interviewed at length
about select subjects. Focus groups provide
researchers with insights, new hypotheses, and
understanding through the process of interaction.
They allow for extensive probing, follow-up
questions, group discussion, and observation of
emotional reaction not possible in a quantitative
study such as a telephone or mail survey. Focus
groups allow analyses of thoughts, attitudes,
behaviors, and opinions that have a high level of
content validity; however, because these results
are on small numbers of individuals, the
conclusions rest on face validity and rely on the
depth of analysis rather than breadth of analysis.
Focus group research, as does all qualitative
research, sacrifices reliability, or the ability
to replicate results, for the sake of increased
validity. |
AZGFD
 | The
Arizona focus groups revealed strong support for
the proposed mentored hunt program among group
participants, most of whom were avid hunters with
several decades of hunting experience. While group
participants were uniformly enthusiastic about the
prospect of mentoring youths, a number of them
also pointed out the potential for longtime
hunters to use the program to take other adults
hunting, especially non-hunters or lapsed
hunters.
For many individuals in the focus groups,
mentoring was not an unfamiliar concept. A number
of participants spoke positively about passing on
the hunting tradition to children, spouses,
friends, and co-workers. One hunter recounted
teaching a neighbor's son to hunt: "I came home
from work one day and there was a note on the door
from a nine-year-old boy with a single mom down
the street, and it had an elk drawn on it and
said, 'Will you please take me hunting someday? I
really want to go.' And that Saturday we went
hunting. And now he's sixteen and I think he hunts
more than I do." Additionally, several group
participants had volunteered as hunter safety
instructors or had participated in a youth camp or
family event weekend sponsored by the AZGFD (e.g.,
Wapiti Weekend).
AZGFD
 | In
discussing the logistics of the mentored hunt
program structure, hunters in the focus groups
identified safety and costs associated with
hunting as two of the biggest potential hurdles to
participation in a mentoring program. Summarizing
these points, one hunter commented, "Number one,
you've got to have safety. Number two, you've got
to have the resources to take them out. A shooting
range will welcome a group. But if you don't have
these basic resources -- safety and opportunities
-- you can't mentor." The importance of safety was
also discussed in the context of liability
concerns, and on this point, most hunters
recommended that the Department or hunt
coordinators address liability issues proactively
at the outset of programs.
It was also suggested that small game hunting
opportunities, such as dove, squirrel, or rabbit
hunts, may work best for initiating new hunters
since they represent relatively easy hunting
opportunities providing the greatest chances of
initial hunt success. Additionally, most hunters
in the groups opposed the concept of incentives
for mentor volunteers, with one hunter stating,
"I'd rather people become mentors because they're
passionate, not for the
incentives." |
AZGFD
 | Addressing
the broad issue of hunting initiation, several
people in the group discussions suggested
introducing newcomers to hunting through a variety
of different topics and instructional
opportunities emphasizing wildlife, the outdoors,
and related activities (shooting, fishing,
camping, conservation and biology, etc.).
According to some hunters, the most important step
toward initiating newcomers into hunting is to get
the person outside. One hunter elaborated: "The
whole outdoors experience is such a place of
wonder for someone who's never been there. There's
something really fascinating about being out
there. Hunting doesn't necessarily have to be
about the animals -- it's about kids exploring new
horizons."
Maintaining volunteer awareness of mentoring
opportunities was considered to be an essential
component of a mentoring program. In fact, several
focus group participants said they would be happy
to volunteer as mentors but were unaware that such
opportunities existed -- in this regard, effective
information dissemination and publicity are
critical. Said one hunter, "I would love to spend
my free time teaching kids to hunt. But I don't
know anything about it because I don't hear
anything about it. So I'm sitting home doing
nothing when I could be helping someone." Several
people commented that hunter safety courses and
nonprofit sportsmen's organizations might be good
opportunities for recruiting mentor volunteers.
Overall, the groups suggested that hunters learn
about hunting opportunities from a variety of
information sources, so a diversified publicity
approach may be the best way to reach individuals
interested in participating in a mentoring
program.
AZGFD
 | As
a whole, the focus group research suggests that a
Department-sponsored mentored hunt program will
enjoy strong support from longtime hunters
interested in imparting to others the hunting
heritage. Both youths and adults interested in
learning to hunt are fortunate to have a pool of
dedicated, supportive hunters in Arizona ready to
communicate skills and ethics -- the only
remaining challenge is ensuring that newcomers and
teachers know how to find each other. In any case,
the most effective mentoring program will be a
well-publicized effort that keeps safety and
liability concerns at the forefront of the
program, includes opportunities for both youths
and adults, presents a wide range of hunting
experiences (including small game), maintains
volunteer participation from veteran hunters, and
presents hunting as one part of the overall
outdoors experience.
The full focus group report is available here (220KB PDF). A printable
version of this article is available here (1MB
PDF). |
|
Responsive
Management would like to thank Denise Raum of
AZGFD for her collaboration on this project, and
Doug Burt of AZGFD for providing photographs for
this
article. |
|
| |